I thought I would share some of the sites I visit on a regular basis. I think they can offer insight into who we are as individuals. First up, my latest love is, of course, about me! (just kidding)
In actuality, this site is great at getting a peek into the lives of writers. It's Norah Wilson's Workspace Wednesdays, and here is an example of it.
I also am a bit of a geonut. Hence I check out where the recent earthquakes have happened. Earthquakes
Also, I enjoy checking out what the authors are saying at Best Indie Bookstore. Author Talk
For news and such, I enjoy a few sites such as CTV News, (though they get a bit tabloid-ish sometimes) CTV
And no morning check would be complete if I didn't check the weather, in case there are warnings. Weather.
So you can see that I am a bit of nature nut, enjoy heart-warming stories and always read what other authors are saying and doing.
What are your routine sites? What do you think they say about you?
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Monday, February 11, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
|Write This, Not That|
Today, I'd like to welcome Sue deMello, a prolific author who has finally put together a comprehensive book on writing. And, I'm proud to say, quoted moi in it. Ahh, you should see me puffing up with pride!
WriteThis, Not That! is a short, snappy, pithy treatise on writing which, if you’re a serious author, will change your life...your writing life, anyway. With sections on dialog, info dumps, setting and more, this skinny little book packs a powerful punch, amplified by contributions from numerous published novelists.
Best-selling, award-winning author Suz deMello, a.k.a Sue Swift, has written over sixteen romance novels in several subgenres, including comedy, historical, mystery and suspense, plus a number of short stories and non-fiction articles on writing.
A freelance editor, she’s worked for Total-E-Bound, Ai Press, and Liquid Silver Books. She also takes private clients.
Her books have been favorably reviewed in Publishers Weekly, Kirkus and Booklist, won a contest or two, attained the finals of the RITA and hit several bestseller lists.
A former trial attorney, Sue's passion is world travel. She’s left the US over a dozen times, including lengthy stints working overseas. She’s still writing and is also planning her next trip.
Find her books at http://www.suzdemello.com
For editing services, email her at firstname.lastname@example.org
Befriend her on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sueswift
She tweets her reading picks @ReadThis4fun
Her current blog is http://www.fearlessfastpacedfiction.com
Below is an excerpt of this book. Even this little tidbit has some good info.
WRITE THIS, NOT THAT
A while back I initiated an online discussion with some other writers about books. My question was: what earns a book a home in our hearts as opposed to a trip to the shredder? I gathered comments from various yahoogroups before adding them to the “knowledge” garnered from a lifetime of reading, sixteen years of fiction writing, and a mini-career editing for individuals as well as for a variety of publishing companies. I have authored and edited most kinds of writing from academic treatises to the sexiest erotica. Although much of my experience is in romance, the principles in this essay are applicable to most fiction writing.
Some information surprised me while other statements struck me as mundane. And I found startling omissions: for example, many didn’t decry the lack of a happy ending in a few books, preferring an interesting ending to a predictable one. But many comments focused on a few well-defined topics: dialog and tags; the despised info dump; a category I call “respecting the language;” avoiding clichés, both verbal and situational; characterization errors; plotting missteps and a failure to edit. The “talking head in the empty room syndrome” is a particular irritant to me, and, as a former acquiring editor, I have strong opinions regarding synopses.
Many mistakes can and should be avoided or fixed before anyone, even a critique partner, sees your work in progress.
DIALOG, THE CORE OF YOUR NOVEL
Romances are all about the interactions between two people. In fact, most novels, unless they’re Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea or similar books, involve the interactions between people, and most of these interactions are verbal. But dialog can be especially tricky to write.
Here’s what you can do: Listen and cut.
To avoid stilted dialog, listen. Go to different venues and eavesdrop. Coffee houses, like Starbucks and Peet’s. Bars. Truck stops and grocery stores. If you write for the young adult market, go to where teens are. When you take your kid and her friends to a concert or to the opening of the next hot teen flick, don’t drop them off and leave. Go in. Listen. Not to the concert but to the kids, not just yours but others.
If you’re fortunate enough to travel, do the same research wherever you go. Don’t stay in your hotel. Walk a few blocks away to a local café or dive and listen to the locals chat. Take notes.
Focus on the words people use and the way they put sentences together. Note slang terms.
Have you ever noticed that in some parts of the USA people say soda rather than pop? In other American locales, any fizzy drink is a Coke, whether or not it’s cola. In Georgia, a woman’s handbag is a pocketbook, even if the satchel can’t fit into her pocket. In California it’s her purse. Regional differences in speech are numerous and fascinating. Note them. Use them.
Listen, but cut
Many of my conversations run something like this:
“Hey, hi, Sue. How’re ya doin’?”
“I’m okay. You?”
“Not much. Tryin’ to stay dry.”
The only variations are seasonal. In January, I’m trying to stay dry. In July, I’m trying to stay cool.
The conversation doesn’t say much and I’d never put it in a book, unless I wanted to lull the reader into an unsuspecting stupor before a vampire sank fangs into a victim or a meteor slammed into our planet.
So the vast majority of realistic interactions don’t belong in a book. Interactions should have a purpose; in fact, every word in your book should have a purpose.
What purposes can we define?
If you like what you read, go to http://www.tinyurl.com/suzdemellowritethis